Democracy in America | The Economist interviews Barack Obama

The president on dealing with Russia

The country has always had a Janus-like quality, looking both East and West, says Mr Obama

By The Economist

IN HIS cabin aboard Air Force One, returning to Washington, DC, from Kansas City, Barack Obama talked with John Micklethwait and Edward Carr from The Economist. The president was unusually relaxed and contemplative, buoyed by the recent economic numbers and looking towards his legacy as well as the mid-term elections and his wrangles with Congress. Because the interview took place on board a plane with three people hunched round a microphone, the sound quality is less than perfect. In these edited highlights from the conversation, Mr Obama discusses America's relationship with Russia. A transcript (lightly edited for clarity) appears below.

The president also shared his thoughts on Africa, China, multilateralism and American business; the full interview (with transcript) can be foundhere.

The Economist: You tried to reset with Russia. Angela Merkel spent the whole time telephoning Vladimir Putin. To what extent do you feel let down almost personally by what’s happened?

Mr Obama: I don’t feel let down. We had a very productive relationship with President Medvedev. We got a lot of things done that we needed to get done. Russia I think has always had a Janus-like quality, both looking east and west, and I think President Putin represents a deep strain in Russia that is probably harmful to Russia over the long term, but in the short term can be politically popular at home and very troublesome abroad.

But I do think it’s important to keep perspective. Russia doesn’t make anything. Immigrants aren’t rushing to Moscow in search of opportunity. The life expectancy of the Russian male is around 60 years old. The population is shrinking. And so we have to respond with resolve in what are effectively regional challenges that Russia presents. We have to make sure that they don’t escalate where suddenly nuclear weapons are back in the discussion of foreign policy. And as long as we do that, then I think history is on our side.

More from Democracy in America

The fifth Democratic primary debate showed that a cull is overdue

Thinning out the field of Democrats could focus minds on the way to Iowa’s caucuses

The election for Kentucky’s governor will be a referendum on Donald Trump

Matt Bevin, the unpopular incumbent, hopes to survive a formidable challenge by aligning himself with the president


A state court blocks North Carolina’s Republican-friendly map

The gerrymandering fix could help Democrats keep the House in 2020